Surprise!!

  • oxjox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    il y a 10 mois

    Colorado had previously disqualified another candidate.

    Who was the other candidate? My understanding is that this case is unique in that it pertains to the President. The President is the only official elected by all Americans so this is what separates them from other officials, congressional candidates, presidential electors, etc. If someone is running for president, they should be accessible to vote for by all Americans.

    If someone is illegible for President, is it proper for individual states to make the determination to keep them off the ballot? Or should it be a decision made by congress, SCOTUS, the presidential electors, or the political party? This part isn’t mentioned in the constitution. And uhhh, as we know, the constitution says whatever isn’t in the constitution is left to the states. Still, that’s a tricky corner to be stuck in when you’re talking about 50 states voting for President.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      il y a 10 mois

      It was indeed a presidential candidate. Hassan v Colorado, 2012.

      … as the magistrate judge’s opinion makes clear and we expressly reaffirm here, a state’s legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office. See generally Munro v. Socialist Workers Party, 479 U.S. 189, 193-95 (1986); Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 145 (1972).

      Also, you’ve got a typo. Ineligible. Illegible means something written so poorly that it cannot be understood.