• PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    So we should just let ‘minorities’ suffer? The term appeasement comes to mind, as I don’t know what else you could be advocating here.

      • Glitchington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?

          Let me re-write it using your analogy.

          Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.

          This isn’t a zero sum game.

          • Glitchington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.