• Glitchington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?

      Let me re-write it using your analogy.

      Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.

      This isn’t a zero sum game.

      • Glitchington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.