• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The system was going to strike! The system was working correctly when the majority of workers voted to reject the contract and the contract was rejected. Biden and Congress stopped the system from working. Why do you keep lying about this?

    You keep saying a majority of unions voted against the strike but that isn’t how votes were actually counted!

    And when the majority of workers vote to strike, the workers that vote against it stand with them in solidarity.

    You keep insisting that Biden was blameless, but there was going to be a strike. The democratic result of the vote, where the majority voted to strike, was going to happen. The rank-and-file democratic majority won. Democracy was working.

    Biden and Congress are the reason the strike was broken. Stop with your historical revisionism.

    • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      oooookay. I see where the problem is coming from. So, from the outside, or based on what is shown in movies and TV, when a group wants to strike, it seems like they all secretly pass notes to each other in the lunchroom, and then magically come together in a rainbow picket line a few days later.

      That’s not how it works.

      When a union wants to strike, it is because a large number of it’s members have said they think it should happen. Then, a proper vote is put into place, and all of those votes are tallied and the Union leadership decides if there will be a strike or not. In the case of a strike, then the entire union goes on strike, regardless of how you voted when they asked if you wanted to strike. If you don’t agree with the strike, you may sit at home and not participate, but you don’t work. If you do go in to work, and you cross that line, you are a scab, and scabs are very bad people.

      So, now that we have laid out the series of events leading up to the strike, lets take a look at what Biden did.

      Biden sat down with the leadership, and said, “Hey, I hear there’s going to be a strike. What can I do to prevent it.” And the leaders said, “We want these things…” Biden said, “Well, here’s what I can agree to,” and passed over the list of what he was able to get other lawmakers to agree to. 75% of the Unions leadership in the room agreed to the proposal, and decided that their particular union would not strike. The other 25%, even though they represented a large portion of all workers, knew that the strike wouldn’t be effective without 100%, and so they didn’t strike, either.

      So, looking at this, where is the point of failure? Seems like the lack of coordination between the unions in agreeing on what was acceptable was the problem. Biden did his job. He gave them the best he could, and it was accepted by the majority. Done.

      Des that clear this whole mess up for you? Can we stop arguing this now?

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, from the outside, or based on what is shown in movies and TV, when a group wants to strike, it seems like they all secretly pass notes to each other in the lunchroom, and then magically come together in a rainbow picket line a few days later.

        Wow, thanks for condescending to me like I’m a child that doesn’t know how voting works. Very cool and good.

        Biden sat down with the leadership, and said, “Hey, I hear there’s going to be a strike. What can I do to prevent it.” And the leaders said, “We want these things…” Biden said, “Well, here’s what I can agree to,” and passed over the list of what he was able to get other lawmakers to agree to. 75% of the Unions leadership in the room agreed to the proposal, and decided that their particular union would not strike.

        This is historical revisionism.

        The tentative deal that Biden helped them reach when he sat down with leadership was a deal that got voted down by the workers. I can not stress this enough. The unions voted, the majority of workers voted “no”, and so a strike was going to happen. That’s why Biden had to go above them to Congress and rammed the deal through against the wishes of the workers. That’s why it required signing a bill!

        And what do you think that bill did?

        Once that bill was signed, a strike would have been illegal. That’s why they decided not to strike. Biden and Congress forced the workers to accept a contract that they didn’t want and said “if you strike anyway you can be fired, sued, or even arrested”. The union leadership bowed to pressure coming from Biden and the legal threats stacked up against them. I do somewhat resent them for that, but I can’t really blame them - things aren’t bad enough for unions to start illegally striking and making an enemy of America’s government.

        And so derailments keep happening and the safety concerns behind the original intent to strike have not been solved.

        Des that clear this whole mess up for you? Can we stop arguing this now?

        We can stop arguing, but I won’t vote for Biden again. Between this betrayal and the genocide in Israel it’s clear there’s no point.

        • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok. This is my last reply. Say whatever you want afterward, I’m not responding.

          Biden created a bill and presents it to union leadership based on what lawmakers are willing to pass into law. The leadership presents the bill to the workers. The workers vote. The leadership tells Biden they agree. Biden signs the bill. That’s it. That’s the fucking flow of events. Biden didn’t go against the will of a vote he didn’t call for. He presented a fucking solution, and the solution was agreed to. It doesn’t matter to Biden what the workers voted for. He didn’t ask for a vote. He asked the leadership what their decision was. By your own logic, the leadership betrayed the workers by not giving proper representation of their will.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So you’re just lying? The workers voted against it and then he presented a bill to Congress, and they signed it. The union had zero power.

            If your explanation of events was true, Biden wouldn’t have needed an act of Congress in the first place! Why do you think he had to do that?