• racsol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t have said it better.

    You have dictatorships you would not identify stereotypically as fascist, yet they silence anyone dangerous by calling them a fascist. Oldest trick in the book.

    A very simple test: A f*ing fascist could use the same comic to justify repressing communists in a fascist regime. It just has to replace those “fascists” believes by communist ones.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what worries me about large centralized platforms. They normalize the idea that offensive speakers should be silenced, or should be able to silence dissent. They shouldn’t. They should be challenged or ignored. You can block an individual, controlling what you listen to. You can urge others to ignore them. But it should be a cringeworthy act of authoritarianism to lay down a banhammer and block someone from speaking.

      The offensive, intolerant asshole should not be banning dissenters; dissenters should not be banning assholes. Any banning anywhere should be seen as deeply troubling, and only done openly, publicly, and with the consent and agreement of the community.

      Unilateral control over the process should be seen as fascism.

      I am thrilled at the decentralized nature of Lemmy effectively eliminating that capability.