• HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If only people stopped buying Nvidia…

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unfortunately they’re not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there’s really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don’t need CUDA, however

    • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1…

      Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn’t a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If only AMD would catch up with DLSS

        DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That’s just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine.

        • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn’t at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn’t exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn’t be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel’s XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene.