• putoelquelolea
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Let me break it down for you:

            1. You posted a humorous meme that was easily understood
            2. I made a comment with a different joke along the same lines (Get it? Lines? Geometry?)
            3. You then explained (poorly) your original joke, thinking that I hadn’t been able to grasp the surrealism of the underlying metaphor
            4. I made fun of your obtuse (See? More geometry there) “explanation”
            5. You still thought I hadn’t understood and gave me a woosh
            6. Right back atcha
            7. Now you have gone back to explaining your joke again
            8. Why are you so angry? Lighten up
              • putoelquelolea
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Surrealism doesn’t mean what you think it means.

                Uhhh, it’s a quote from HHGttG

                Also I still maintain that you didn’t understand my original joke, otherwise you would have called my explanation “unnecessary”, not “poor”.

                OK, if you say so

                Now, I didn’t read your comment as a joke, and I still don’t. I read it as a pun only, and I’m still very confused by its execution.

                Do you get confused a lot? I’m obviously impressed by your profound knowledge of geometry, but you may not have reached the part where you can use π to calculate the area of a circle: πr2, which is pronounced like pie are squared. Only pie are not squared, pie are round. Did ya get it now, honey? (Side note: It’s not pronounced pie are two. Maybe that’s why you still don’t get it)

                I think you should just give up and go to sleep now. That’s what I’m going to do

                  • putoelquelolea
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You know what? You’re right. “π r square, not. Round, π r, too.” would have worked remarkably better. 😜

                    I truly regret the time I wasted answering you, as I will never get that back…

                    I mean … you have been arguing about geometry puns. What kind of ROI were you expecting?