• spauldo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, but that’s the BBC. Surely there’s enough news in the entirety of the UK that they don’t need to resort to astronomical phenomena that are both meaningless and invisible without measuring tools. Hell, tell me what part of the sky the planets will be - at least I can see those.

    • Solivine@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather have some meaningless astronomical phenomena in there, it’s a bit more interesting than more suffering and breaks up the negative content.

      • spauldo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s tons of meaningless astronomical phenomena that you can actually go out and see, though. “Jupiter and Saturn will be close together in the western sky just after sundown,” for instance. They could even have a star chart showing the constellations so you can identify them yourself. Easy to turn into a one-minute blurb.

    • fred
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also get paid regardless of whether you change the channel.