California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit Monday against the Chino school district, ordering an end to a policy that requires notifying parents if their children change their gender identity, alleging it is discriminatory and violates civil rights and privacy laws.

The “parental notification” policy, which has been proposed by a handful of conservative-leaning districts in California, puts transgender and gender-nonconforming students in “danger of imminent, irreparable harm” by potentially forcibly “outing” them at home before they’re ready, according to the lawsuit.

  • pulaskiwasright
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    You didn’t actually read what I wrote then. You saw some things that you disagree with and then shit your brain off and imagined me as a monster. This is why we can’t have nice things.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We can’t have nice things becaude chucklefucks like you don’t give a shit if kids get beat.

      You can claim you do all you want, but that’s the very obvious outcome of not heavily opposing schools outing kids.

      • pulaskiwasright
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can’t have nice things because as soon as someone says something that isn’t so dogmatic that it matches opinion 100% you imagine the other person to be a monster and shut off your brain before you even realize you have common ground. For example, I agree that this disclosure agreement is bad because some kids will be very hurt by it both physically and emotionally. But you’re too ignorant and reactionary to even realize that. And people on both sides have become just like you and that’s why we can’t have nice things.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      We can’t have nice things because people like you call honest arguments and sincere problems “dishonest”.

      • pulaskiwasright
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a sincere problem and a dishonest argument against it. And you can’t even get past your reflexive reaction to being slightly disagreed with to see that we agree with each other. That’s why we can’t have nice things. Too many people from all viewpoints can’t get along because they reflexively imagine people with slightly differing opinions to be monsters.

          • pulaskiwasright
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That doesn’t make any sense. I’m the only person who acknowledges that we agree with each other that this disclosure is a problem and will get people hurt. I did it in the first comment I made. So you’re still being ridiculous and dishonest.

              • pulaskiwasright
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You keep making dishonest arguments. I’m not going to bother using a new synonym for “dishonest” every time.