Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • beteljuice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s really fucked up is that selling a rental property doesn’t incur the same tax penalties as selling a lived-in home. Should be the opposite. How ass-backwards can you get?