When asked about the federal government’s role, 41% of Americans say it should encourage the production of nuclear power.

Let’s get those new construction contracts signed!

  • lntlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yikes! It’s not about sticking it to the man. I don’t care who owns the nuclear industry.

    I care about leaving an atmosphere to the children. Nothing can get in the way of that.

      • lntlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s simply not about the industry.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is gifting grifters trillions of dollars to make negligible impact on climate change in response to a fossil industry marketing campaign not about the grifters or the fossil industry?

          • lntlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because it’s about the atmosphere. If we need more money, we’ll just print it like always. This is such a silly point you’re tryna make.

            • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Money represents resources and labour.

              The 5GW of distributed or utility solar uses less mass and less of every individual element than the 1GW nuclear reactor except for Silicon and Oxygen (the most abundant things). 3GW of wind requires much less of everything except concrete (and the gap is closing rapidly).

              1000 people (including the underpaid factory workers and the upstream supply chain) working for a year can produce, ship and install the utility PV or 2-3 years for distributed, but it takes the same workforce a decade for the NPP just at the construction site (excluding the underpaid miners in Uzbekistan or Niger).

              You’re also presupposing results that have never happened historically and are incredibly easy for the fossil fuel industry (who are pushing this) to delay or sabotage.

              • lntlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                So nuclear makes more jobs too?

                • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you want to run a hole digging campaign with public money you can do it with something that doesn’t permanently poison native land.

                  Or alternatively employ those people to do something useful.

                  • lntlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    When did you realize you’re talking to the same nasty person in two different threads?? ::rotflcoptr::