I kind of remember people having the same take back around 2000 on the Web and search engines. Like, a lot of concern that just anyone could put up a webpage and that people might rely on them blindly.
And then later Wikipedia, because just anyone could edit it.
True but that took quite a while. Even then, misinformation was quite a problem and continued to be. I like the comparison because it highlights that healthy scrutiny and questioning are important.
Honestly, the EU doesn’t have to worry about Bard. It’s painfully bad.
Going to hard disagree.
ChatGPT has gotten bad. Lots of Coding responses that used to be correct. Bard is better. And it also provides sources.
I don’t have a stake in the AI race. I just want something that works.
Also, bad AI is equally worrisome as people often rely on it blindly.
I kind of remember people having the same take back around 2000 on the Web and search engines. Like, a lot of concern that just anyone could put up a webpage and that people might rely on them blindly.
And then later Wikipedia, because just anyone could edit it.
True but that took quite a while. Even then, misinformation was quite a problem and continued to be. I like the comparison because it highlights that healthy scrutiny and questioning are important.
at least its better than the “bing” chatbot… its so much worse than chatgpt which its based on - it makes no sense!
it’s GPT-4 now.
I have far better experience with Bings chat. Try getting better at making prompts
It has gotten better recently, but still far from ChatGPT
I find it better than GPT for explaining code. For everything else yeah it sucks