• Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, the EU doesn’t have to worry about Bard. It’s painfully bad.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Going to hard disagree.

      ChatGPT has gotten bad. Lots of Coding responses that used to be correct. Bard is better. And it also provides sources.

      I don’t have a stake in the AI race. I just want something that works.

      • sic_1@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, bad AI is equally worrisome as people often rely on it blindly.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I kind of remember people having the same take back around 2000 on the Web and search engines. Like, a lot of concern that just anyone could put up a webpage and that people might rely on them blindly.

          And then later Wikipedia, because just anyone could edit it.

          • sic_1@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True but that took quite a while. Even then, misinformation was quite a problem and continued to be. I like the comparison because it highlights that healthy scrutiny and questioning are important.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, the EU doesn’t have to worry about Bard. It’s painfully bad.

      at least its better than the “bing” chatbot… its so much worse than chatgpt which its based on - it makes no sense!