Went to a restaurant in LA today and when I got the check I noticed that it was a bit higher than it should be. Then I noticed this 18% service charge. So… We, as customers, need to help pay for their servers instead of the owners paying their servers a living wage. And on top of that they have suggested tip. I called bs on this. I will bet you that the servers do not see a dime of this 18% service charge. [deleted a word so it wasn’t a grammatical horror to read]

  • Anticorp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That doesn’t say “on the worker’s side” though. It says anti-consumer and selfish. They’re not willing to pay any more if it means they make a little less, they’re just comfortable taking more money from other people.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You realize 100% of the money they’d use to pay their workers more would come from consumers right?

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It could come from profit margin, but that would require the higher ups to not be greedy assholes.

      • Anticorp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course it would. It doesn’t have to (Dan Price is an example of a different model), but it would. At least by wrapping it into the prices consumers can clearly see that increase, instead of this shoddily hidden tactic.