yes, but if you believe the IPCC it’s most likely necessary to become actively carbon negative (and thus begin reversing the impact we’ve had on the planet) rather than just carbon neutral, so making it more economically practical is pretty important in the long-term
Isn’t carbon removal extremely expensive tech?
yes, but if you believe the IPCC it’s most likely necessary to become actively carbon negative (and thus begin reversing the impact we’ve had on the planet) rather than just carbon neutral, so making it more economically practical is pretty important in the long-term
ahhhh, that makes sense thank you