• sibachian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    there is no evidence that jesus existed and the first writing about jesus appears 100 years after he supposedly died. his original story was eventually replaced with a plagiarized version from mithraism; so jesus = mithra. not that there is any evidence that mithra existed either.

    • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe the academic consensus is he likely (>50% probability) existed, but it is for sure disputed by some. Personally I’m not religious and I accept the possibility he existed or maybe he didn’t. Kind of doesn’t really matter because we can be fairly confident he wasn’t the son of god lol

      • sibachian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the problem being that there isn’t any evidence at all. if there was, his existence would be harder to dispute lol.