• barryamelton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Of course I have. I’ve never found any substantiation, which is why I’m asking. I use them every day so I would certainly like to know if there is, but the concerns I constantly see only apply to Chrome, and not Chromium-based browsers.

    Just run WIreshark against your Chromium then. Enjoy.

    This is specifically for the Chromium browser, not Chromium-based browsers. I know, it’s confusing. Chromium is basically just the open-sourced version of Chrome.

    Did you read the link I posted?

    Let me copy-paste directly from the Chromium office page for you then:

    Additional Information on Chromium, Google Chrome, and Privacy

    Features that communicate with Google made available through the compilation of code in Chromium are subject to the Google Privacy Policy.

    There, you have it. Now you can try moving more goalposts again, and provide excuses for them.

    This is yet another item attributed to Chrome and it’s users. You can totally create a Chromium fork that adheres to conventional standards.

    Nah it’s not. I’m talking about Google pushing and implementing IETF standards that hamstring privacy. They are open standards, but they are malicious. That a standard is open doesn’t mean is doing things that are not ethical.

    To me, it’s obvious that you don’t even want to look for proof. Why so hell-bent on taking the stance of a state-level billionare corporation built by extracting privacy from users? How do you think they got there?

    Or do you have something specific against the legal non-profit organization that is Mozilla?

    • HughJanus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      To me it’s clear, based on your personal attacks, that you have no interest in an honest discussion so I will not engage with you further. Goodbye.