Not sure if any of you have encountered the same resistance to using Signal. Some of my cousins refused to use Signal because they are already using “too many chat apps” (e.g. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, WeChat, Telegram, Line, Snapchat, etc.). To them, Signal will just be another chat app among their numerous other chat apps. I understand that jumping between so many messaging apps imposes some kind of cognitive and maintenance burden. What are some ways to convince such people to use Signal?

  • andrewm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You confuse privacy and security with anonymity, they are different things. Also, with the sealed senders option, the sender are hidden.

    • Dienervent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The person I’m talking to is allowed to know who I am so I’m not anonymous. Signal doesn’t need to know who I am. It doesn’t matter what you call it, that’s the feature I’m waiting for to motivate a switch.

      That said, I looked up sealed senders. They really do go above and beyond to end2end encrypt as much as they possibly can.

      It’s just a shame that they insist so hard to tie user accounts to phone numbers.

      • GӨЯKY@greenish.red
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Dienervent @andrewm @citytree @animist @BananaTrifleViolin
        Signal was originally designed with phone number as the key identifier. This is to facilitate contact identification and building the social graph. The real issue is not that you need a phone number to register with signal. The problem is signal exposes the phone number to all people with whom you communicate, including in groups. That is a big privacy concern, especially if you a part of large groups where you don’t want everyone to see your phone number. This is a well known issue and the solution is to have disposable usernames along with ability to hide phone numbers from contacts.
        Signal is currently working on these and some previews are available already. Hopefully that should be released soon.

        • andrewm
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I think the problem here is that people have the habit to use the wrong app for a specific use. Signal is, conceptually, similar to WhatsApp, Built for discussing with people you already know (for WA is stated on the website too “Friends and family”), not for any stranger people in the world. So, it shouldn’t be used for that, app/protocol like Matrix, Threema and Telegram fit better that purpose

      • andrewm
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Signal doesn’t know who you are. A number don’t reveal your identity, and, usually, you should be just a gov. entities to discover that. Does matter what you call it: Signal is for privacy (they have your number, but they don’t know who you are, who you write and what you write), not for (full) anonymity (they don’t have any information, including number, on you).

        Anyway, they’re implementing the username too.