LG and Samsung have both announced their 2025 smart TVs at CES this weekend, and some of them will include access to Microsoft’s Copilot AI assistant. Both TV manufacturers are chasing the artificial intelligence hype train with dedicated AI sections on their smart TVs that include a shortcut to a Copilot web app.

LG is adding an entire AI section to its TVs and rebranding its remote to “AI Remote,” in an effort to sell consumers on the promise of large language models. While it’s not clear exactly how Copilot works on LG’s latest TVs, the company describes access to Copilot as a way to allow users to “efficiently find and organize complex information using contextual cues.”

LG hasn’t demonstrated its Copilot integration just yet, but it has shown off its own AI Chatbot that’s part of its TVs. It appears Copilot will be surfaced when LG TV users want to search for more information on a particular subject.

Samsung also has its own Vision AI brand for its AI-powered TV features this year, which include AI upscaling, Auto HDR Remastering, and Adaptive Sound Pro. There’s also a new AI button on the remote to access AI features like recognizing food on a screen or AI home security features that analyze video feeds from smart cameras.

Microsoft’s Copilot will be part of this Vision AI section. “In collaboration with Microsoft, Samsung announced the new Smart TVs and Smart Monitors featuring Microsoft Copilot,” says Samsung in a press release. “This partnership will enable users to explore a wide range of Copilot services, including personalized content recommendations.”

I asked Samsung for more information or images of Copilot in action, but the company doesn’t have anything more to share right now. I’ve also asked LG and Microsoft for more information about Copilot on TVs and neither company has responded in time for publication. Without any indication of exactly how Copilot works on these TVs, I’m going to chalk this one up as a gimmicky feature that LG, Samsung, and Microsoft clearly aren’t ready to demo yet.

  • ZeroHora
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are still paying for the “”“smart”“” part that they don’t want

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Quite the opposite, actually. The “smart” part gives you huge discounts because they expect to make it back on the data they collect.

      • ZeroHora
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can see the logic, but is actually cheaper or the “dumb TV” is just overpriced? They still need to add a processor and shitty computer parts to the TV to have the smart thingy

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          is actually cheaper or the “dumb TV” is just overpriced?

          I don’t know what that means. I don’t know how old you are or where you are getting your perspective from but before TVs were “smart” they cost waaaay more. Back in like 2012 I paid ~$2k for a 50" plasma TV. Still have the receipt.

          • ZeroHora
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            TV is cheaper now, if you compare it to when the technology for plasma TV, ultra HD and so on first started, production got a lot better and cheaper. What I’m asking is: is the TV part of the “smart TV” cheap and they’re making us pay more for it by adding the smart part, or is the logic that they’re giving a discount because they can make the extra money with the data.

            Because it could start with paying the extra cost with the data, but now it’s the norm and they can charge more for it and still make more money selling data.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              or is the logic that they’re giving a discount because they can make the extra money with the data.

              Yes that is what I said.

              but now it’s the norm and they can charge more for it and still make more money selling data.

              They still have to compete with all the other TV manufacturers.

              • ZeroHora
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                They still have to compete with all the other TV manufacturers.

                The only big manufacturer that I can remember that I never saw making smart TVs is Fujitsu and I don’t even know if they are still making TVs

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          the parts are mostly already there anyway for image processing, perhaps upgraded slightly. I doubt it’s a significant cost.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The smart part of a large TV is cheap. Also why they’re slow af. The price is dominated by the LCD module.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every time I asked for a high-quality, non-RGB/backlight, yet affordable keyboard, people never understood that I’d still pay for it.