Midnight@slrpnk.netM to collapse of the old society@slrpnk.net · 4 days agoIs it safe to have a child? Americans rethink family planning ahead of Trump’s returnwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1171arrow-down13
arrow-up1168arrow-down1external-linkIs it safe to have a child? Americans rethink family planning ahead of Trump’s returnwww.theguardian.comMidnight@slrpnk.netM to collapse of the old society@slrpnk.net · 4 days agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarekroldenlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·3 days ago watch the video Its three hours long no thanks.
minus-squareVerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 days agoOk. If someone’s thinking about a lifelong decision, it’s well worth that 3 hours of being spoonfed the dozens hours of research that went into it. (That’s just for whoever passes by to read this. I do not care what you do personally.)
minus-squarehomesnatch@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoBeing spoonfed dozens of hours of cherry-picked research is exactly the problem with lots of “youtube research” like this. One could do another 3 hour video on the subject “Natalism is the tool of the nazis” also rooted in cherry-picked sources.
minus-squareUmbrias@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoyou’re aware this logic applies to any information in any form, yes? that’s why you need to engage critically with a text, not just numbly accept or dismiss them…
minus-squareVerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 days ago Wah youtube In response to a link to a creator who has litterally dedicated a video to grapple with the dynamic that we as audiences need to consume information with care Idk what to tell ya. A lot of people enjoy learning in this format. You do know a person can read in addition to watching a video, dont be silly ✨️
minus-squareUmbrias@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 days agodid you read the rest of the comment? this is a topic worth taking seriously rather than be flippantly dismissive.
Its three hours long no thanks.
Ok.
If someone’s thinking about a lifelong decision, it’s well worth that 3 hours of being spoonfed the dozens hours of research that went into it.
(That’s just for whoever passes by to read this. I do not care what you do personally.)
Being spoonfed dozens of hours of cherry-picked research is exactly the problem with lots of “youtube research” like this.
One could do another 3 hour video on the subject “Natalism is the tool of the nazis” also rooted in cherry-picked sources.
you’re aware this logic applies to any information in any form, yes? that’s why you need to engage critically with a text, not just numbly accept or dismiss them…
In response to a link to a creator who has litterally dedicated a video to grapple with the dynamic that we as audiences need to consume information with care
Idk what to tell ya. A lot of people enjoy learning in this format. You do know a person can read in addition to watching a video, dont be silly ✨️
did you read the rest of the comment? this is a topic worth taking seriously rather than be flippantly dismissive.