Hello All,

I am trying to run scrutiny via docker compose and I am running into an issue where nothing shows up on the wub UI. If anyone here has this working would love some ideas on what the issue could be.

as per there trouble shooting for this I followed those steps and here is the output

$ smartctl --scan
/dev/sda -d scsi # /dev/sda, SCSI device
/dev/sdb -d sat # /dev/sdb [SAT], ATA device
/dev/nvme0 -d nvme # /dev/nvme0, NVMe device
docker run -it --rm \
  -v /run/udev:/run/udev:ro \
  --cap-add SYS_RAWIO \
  --device=/dev/sda \
  --device=/dev/sdb \
  ghcr.io/analogj/scrutiny:master-collector smartctl --scan
/dev/sda -d scsi # /dev/sda, SCSI device
/dev/sdb -d sat # /dev/sdb [SAT], ATA device

So I think I am imputing the devices correctly.

I only really changed the port number for the web UI to 8090 from 8080 in there example as 8080 is taken. compose file

services:
  influxdb:
    image: influxdb:2.2
    ports:
      - '8086:8086'
    volumes:
      - './influxdb:/var/lib/influxdb2'
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:8086/health"]
      interval: 5s
      timeout: 10s
      retries: 20


  web:
    image: 'ghcr.io/analogj/scrutiny:master-web'
    ports:
      - '8090:8090'
    volumes:
      - './config:/opt/scrutiny/config'
    environment:
      SCRUTINY_WEB_INFLUXDB_HOST: 'influxdb'
    depends_on:
      influxdb:
        condition: service_healthy
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:8090/api/health"]
      interval: 5s
      timeout: 10s
      retries: 20
      start_period: 10s

  collector:
    image: 'ghcr.io/analogj/scrutiny:master-collector'
    cap_add:
      - SYS_RAWIO
    volumes:
      - '/run/udev:/run/udev:ro'
    environment:
      COLLECTOR_API_ENDPOINT: 'http://web:8090/'
      COLLECTOR_HOST_ID: 'scrutiny-collector-hostname'
    depends_on:
      web:
        condition: service_healthy
    devices:
      - "/dev/sda"
      - "/dev/sdb"

everything appears to start and work and no errors in the terminal.

Thanks for the help.

  • ShortN0te
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    NOTE: Scrutiny is a Work-in-Progress and still has some rough edges.

    Honestly, at this point i would not recommend the usage of scrutiny, the development was almost ways really slow and the creater does not seem to have kuch interest in the project. There are still standing issues and imho important features missing.

    I would look into prometheus+grafana or something of that sort.