• dev_null
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.

      • dev_null
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Go ahead and continue pretending grammar nazis have a secret agenda of white knighting for corporations then.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          no one made a general argument about grammar nazis so far but here you go: grammar nazis are a different kind of wrong and dumb, but this is not about that. if it was, I’d be making fun of them for that reason. you’re engaging in strawman arguments now, you might as well just quit because you clearly have nothing here.

          • dev_null
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            no one made a general argument about grammar nazis so far

            I did, I said generally their motivation is not concern for trademarks. It was in fact my first comment here.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I obviously mean no one you’re arguing against. grammar nazis have no relevance to this entire conversation. except the one you’re having with yourself.

              • dev_null
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                grammar nazis have no relevance to this entire conversatior

                Your replies to my comment are off topic then, because that’s what my talking about.