“After extensive consultation, discussion, and deliberation, the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force has decided to encourage American Muslims to vote for any presidential candidate of their choosing who supports a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and a US arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as candidates Dr Jill Stein, Dr Cornel West or Chase Oliver,” read the statement, obtained by Middle East Eye.

The statement was written by the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, an umbrella group formed this year that consists of a number of prominent Muslim organisations including the political arms of Americans for Justice in Palestine (AJP), Cair, and the US Council of Muslim Organizations.

“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by US laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” the statement read.

  • BigLime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My point was that voting for a third party still makes your voice heard, regardless if your guy won or not. Even Bush jr had to acknowledge climate change, and the Biden administration is struggling with the border issue. An issue Republicans voted for… on a guy that lost. Their voice is still being heard, and represented even though their guy is running away from jail atm.

    But since fascists like saying opposition to one party monopolies or duopolies is futile or the norm, I’ll say, it’s not. It’s the way a democracy should work. Many parties ruling instead of just one or two, people having their voices heard (not just old people).

    • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      So, you’re asking Democrats to make their voice heard and not vote Kamala. Who’s gonna be the one to answer then?

      Put any spin you want on it, a vote against Kamala is a vote for Trump. Now shush you insipid tankie.

      • BigLime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        A vote is a vote, and why would you vote for a candidate you think wouldnt represent your values or you?

        Your calling me a tankie is no different than Trump calling Kamala a Marxist.

        • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Wrong again, you belong to this movement of voter suppression tactics and you’re showing that your anti- democratic arguments actually fall right in line with right wing vote suppression tactics . Keep using your shield of equivalency. I call it like I see it.

          Feel free to check, I’ve been called y’all out since day one of the respectable Ms. Harris’s candidacy

          • BigLime
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Can you show evidence of right wingers saying to vote for third party candidates? Do you call everyone who disagrees with you a tankie (im usually called a menace to society)? And its Mrs. Harris. I read Mrs. Harris’ books and made up my mind that I don’t like her as a candidate, she voiced concerning language, and shes backtracked on things like fracking and marijuana now.

            • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              27 minutes ago

              Calling for evidence against a known felon isn’t gonna get you anywhere in this part. Hello, who you talking to, a stinking liberal Democrat voter. I have faith in who knows whats right. The voter.

              • BigLime
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 minutes ago

                I’m actually confused to what you’re trying to say here, I was asking you for evidence of republicans saying to vote for a third party candidate so you can support your claim that that’s what one of their voter suppression tactics are. I’ve been saying this whole time that voters know whats right for them and should choose someone they believe in, not just because its the popular choice.

                Explain to me how telling people to vote for a candidate they believe represent their values; is the same as abolishing voting by mail or other voter suppression tactics? Stop pivoting