More than a dozen former Ronald Reagan staff members have joined dozens of other Republican figures endorsing the Democratic nominee and vice-president, Kamala Harris, saying their support was “less about supporting the Democratic party and more about our resounding support for democracy”.

  • GarbageShootAlt2
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Aside from the ICC notoriously being an American running-dog, charges are not convictions. We’ve already seen Russia cooperate with returning children, we can’t say that there’s no intention of it.

      • GarbageShootAlt2
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The ICC is not trustworthy, and I certainly trust the objective events that even liberal media report on when they come into conflict with what the ICC says. I don’t know what Putin says on this and have not cited him once because that would be absurd. You are denying reality in favor of statements.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I referenced credible sources (here’s another) substantiating the adoption of abducted Ukrainian children by Russian families.

          You referenced your own opinion coupled with speculation, and attempted to discredit widely accepts facts from multinational sources.

          Yeah. I’m the one who’s denying reality.

          • Red Army Dog Cooper
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Kyive independent is not credable nor is it remotly objective, it is a mouth pice of the Ukranian government

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              So again you use your opinion to discredit a source without providing any substantiated information.

              Your opinions aren’t facts. Maybe you should provide a reputable source to support your opinions before calling challenging the credibility of others’ factual sources.

              • Red Army Dog Cooper
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I have provided the same level of evidence, that you have that it is credible or factual or not bias. You where the one that made the positive claim, as is typical rules you have the burdon of proof

                second my evidence is … BASIC meida litericy skills

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You haven’t provided one link to a source in this thread. I’m done with your time-wasting. Good night.

                  • Red Army Dog Cooper
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    you merely posted a link aserting that it was credible, I said that it was not, no one has presented a link over the credibility, my argument is that basic media litericy shows that this has severe biases and not truthful, you have provided nothing, we are still operating under asertions