• electric_nan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    I don’t think that’s a very charitable interpretation of what is easily explained by honest political differences. People can and do work together when possible, but there are also issues too important to compromise on.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      She wants to play them off as honest political differences anyway.

      When her actions match her supposed intentions then I’d be more willing to give her charity.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        15 days ago

        You’re painting “so many leftists we see on the net” with that same brush though. Is it so hard to believe that there are people genuinely to the left of you politically? What “actions” do you need to see from Jill Stein? She’s been running for office, giving interviews and speeches that platform issues that the dems are weak on. If nothing else she’s forcing democrats like AOC (and you, presumably) to engage with these ideas or risk political consequences. If we didn’t have 3rd party candidates to the left, there would be even less pressure on the dems to adopt leftist policies.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          She could start by dropping out of the race, endorsing Kamala, and then putting every dollar she has into organizing for national ranked choice voting so that hopefully once in my life I can vote my conscience at the same time I vote pragmatically.

          I sincerely doubt there is much room between where Stein is at on the issues and where AOC is at on the issues - the main difference is that AOC is not running for president and making it easier for despicable people who don’t care about anything to win.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            That basic strategy is why you rarely see people shitting on Bernie. He manages to pull the conversation to the left while not fucking everything up by being a spoiler.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              Yup. He wants to be the most left option in a two party system, so when he runs to be that, he competes in Democratic primaries (both nationally and locally) to clear the lane so he’s not setting up a scenario where the conservative wins because the left is divided.

              Of course who knows what the centrist Democrats would have done if he’d won a presidential nomination, but at least Bernie did everything right.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            15 days ago

            It’s the Dems that should do that, they have more to lose and more power and money to get it done, no?

            • makyo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              If you mean ranked choice, there are a lot of dems working on it