• slacktoid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just cause something is owned by a big company doesn’t mean it’ll last forever, example Google and their dead list of products.

    Host gitea or forjeo if you really care about your infrastructure and data. If you can’t, make some compromises and pick the next best thing. But owned by big company doesn’t mean lasts forever.

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Github is probably the biggest code hosting platform. There is literally no evidence that Microsoft will discontinue it… And they’ve spent a huge amount of time integrating it. It also generates 1 billion in revenue, so why would Microsoft sell it? Furthermore, its free for open source…

      Self hosting is part of the reason our project failed… We wasted a lot of time with that stuff. We used Mercurial, whatever the Canonical one was, and git, and we wasted a lot of time.

      Github works, and is well integrated to everything

      • slacktoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just pointing out that just cause its owned by a big company doesn’t mean it’ll last forever.

        Also the FOSS community is by in large sus of Microsoft cause of their history practice of embrace, extend, extinguish. Which one would argue they embraced FOSS to gain easy access to their projects, the issues, the code, etc to train their models. Which would be OK if all code it generates has to be GPL to agree with the licenses of the collective pool of training data. Either way that’s the topic of debate.

        It sounds like you looked into your constraints and github works for you. That’s great! And that’s what’s important.