She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

  • CableMonster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So long story short you are in favor of racist hiring policies as long as it harm particular groups that you want to harm?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      So long story short, are you in favor of racist hiring, and continued racist advantage for people of your favorite skin color, regardless of less opportunity for those who look different from you? Are you in favor of keeping hiring pure, white people on top, and everyone else can “pull themselves up by their bootstraps”?

      If you look back at that article, you could see the data that even after this period, non-whites were under-represented, especially in positions of authority.

      • CableMonster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, I am in favor of hiring people that are best for the job. This is a yes or no answer; are you in favor of hiring people based on their skin color if it advances an agenda such as higher representation of a race in a particular area? Would you pick a less qualified minority of a more qualified white person?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The argument is that’s already been done, unless you believe white people are inherently smarter and more capable.

          Assuming all humans have similar potential and similar opportunity, you’d expect over a large population such as the employee pool of the 100 largest companies, the mix of demographics will be similar to the population at large. Why isn’t it?

          While I’m sure there are a few hires purely for quota, giving opportunity to those who would otherwise be denied is a good thing. I’ve always worked in very diverse companies and have found people equally capable regardless of what demographic group you try to stick them in.

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Why isn’t it?

            Because different demographics have varying levels of different qualities. Does every demographic commit crime and attend college at the same levels? No, and for whatever reason they dont there would be a similar reason for why demographics are different at work.

            Are you unable to answer the questions I give? I say its a yes or no answer, and there is neither of those words in your answer.