• electric_nan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not upset about anything. I just don’t see how something is “yours” if you’re still paying for it. Like, I guess it’s partly yours, but it’s mostly the bank’s for a long time.

    • rekorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well see, I made a deal with a bank, that said I would like to borrow, say 100k, and I would be willing to pay it back over 30 years plus extra, or else the bank would have no incentive to do it.

      Separately, they said they would be far more comfortable loaning me money, if I could guarantee that if things went south, there was some sort of asset they could take besides my money.

      It didnt have to be my house, it could have been something else THAT I OWNED. Thats the important part. The house is only collateral because I own it, despite the outstanding mortgage payment.

      Edit to add: this is also why I would keep the profits from selling my house, and would only have to pay off the loan.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, I understand what collateral is. It’s something the bank owns, but allows you to use until you’ve paid it off. For example, the bank keeps the title to my car until I’ve paid it off, and then they send me the title.

        • rekorse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You know what, the way you said it this time just really clicked. I now also hate banks. Good talk.