• sub_ubi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still not voting Biden

      • sub_ubi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Oh? That’s odd, I’m not voting for him either.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not voting or voting third party for POTUS does nothing. It’s just pure vanity. Do what you want, I’m not really trying to change your mind, but it’s a virtually pointless move that doesnt make any sense under the current way we do things.

          • sub_ubi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Not voting or voting third party for POTUS does nothing.

            While that’s a popular and oft-repeated opinion, it’s heterodox among academic historians.

            "Let a third party once demonstrate that votes are to be made by adopting a certain demand, then one of the other parties can be trusted to absorb it. Ultimately, if the demand has merit, it will probably be translated into law or practice by the major party that has taken it up…The chronic supporter of third party tickets need not worry, therefore, when he is told, as he surely will be told, that he is “throwing away his vote.” [A] glance through American history would seem to indicate that his kind of vote is after all probably he most powerful vote that has ever been cast."

            • John D. Hicks, Professor Emeritus of American history at Berkeley
            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Except we have 2 parties still. How did voting third party in the past solve that problem? Proof is in the pudding.

              • sub_ubi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                When one of the two major parties becomes tired of losing elections, they adopt policies from a third party to attract their voters.

                The impact of third parties on American politics extends far beyond their capacity to attract votes. Minor parties, historically, have been a source of important policy innovations. Women’s suffrage, the graduated income tax, and the direct election of senators, to name a few, were all issues that third parties espoused first.

                • Rosenstone, Behr and Lazarus
                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  So, it didn’t solve the problem? I’m not sure what you’re driving at here. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be multiple parties, I’m saying the vote during our presidential election, under our current system, is a strategic one, not one to throw away on a third party.

                  • sub_ubi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    It’s solved many problems.

                    The point that the American historians quoted above are making is that if you enjoy certain policies, like being able to vote for senators, women’s rights, or progressive taxation, thank a third party voter.

    • oxjoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hope you vote for the candidate whom you feel best represents you and the interests you prioritize. I hope your interests and your morals come from a place of clarity that isn’t clouded by biased content designed to manipulate you.

        • TrippyFocus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You may have done so already but you may want to see if the PSL is on the ballot where you are.

          • sub_ubi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah they’re on but if I’m protest voting I’ll be doing it in solidarity with Palestinian groups, which I’m assuming will be similar to primaries.

            • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Unfortunately, a protest vote is a vote for Trump in our two party system. And Trump has said he wants Israel to be more aggressive and “end the war”. And any Palestinian Americans should fear Project 2025 calls for rounding up anyone they think is an “illegal”, or Muslim, or any non-white and wanting to put these people into death camps awaiting deportation. Although many on the right want to just execute everyone.

              Anyways, you can hold your nose and vote for the Dem candidate, or you’ve voted for the death of those who you are trying to protect and so many more minorities.

              • sub_ubi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Believe it or not, I’m familiar with the most common liberal point of view, but thanks for summarizing. Would you also say this is the most important election of our lives?

                • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Since I’ve been able to vote I’ve experienced 9 ‘most important elections of our lifetime,’ and in the end nothing has improved.

                  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Sometimes it’s just about not getting worse. With every win the Right has been erroding people’s rights as quickly as they can. They have packed the courts with some of the least qualified and corrupt justices the country has ever seen. They have waged an attack on minorities both directly and through defunding programs and services that help the countries most in need. They have attacked education and turned librarians from a profession nobody thought anything negative of, to one the Right now deems as equivalent to pedophiles (publicly - we know it’s all projection for their private actions/feelings on pedophilia). So you may keep hearing the same message, because each election is more important than the last as the Right has been playing this long game of normalizing the erosion the foundation of our Republic. The majority of those in Trump’s cult now say they are ok with a King, the very thing this country had fought against and was founded after winning are freedom from.

                • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  How do you rationalize knowing the outcome you’d be voting for, and then staying that course? I understand taking a stand, and wanting change, but voting in a way counter to any of that becoming a possibility doesn’t grok for me. Biden is 81 and is nearing the end of his time here on earth, so empowering the guy that is going to encourage more of the same abroad, and also open death camps for non-whites in the US isn’t going to signal anything to him or the party.

                  • sub_ubi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I rationalize it by listening to Palestinians and their local advocacy groups. Nobody knows better than the victims.

                    If they see one candidate as better than another, they’ll endorse.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Biden providing endless weapons and money is allowing Israel to ‘end the war.’ The marginalized are not afraid of P2025, most have had it their entire lives. So while liberals claimed to have the backs of the marginalized, they demanded a vote for the people keeping them marginalized

                • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So you speak for all marginalized groups and think fascism is something they can just endure so that you can protest vote for a president that has vowed to do the thing you are protesting, only on a larger scale and against the majority of Americans. That is your stance? Don’t be surprised when the leopard eats your face!

              • sub_ubi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Like any other vote, by machine or hand depending on where you live.

                • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I think I’m a bit confused, is there a radio button to fill in on the ballot that says "protest " and then when all votes are counted, we can see a report that says x for dude, y for other dude, and z for protest?

                  • sub_ubi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Yes, fairly close to that. 3rd party votes, uncommitted, and no-votes are all tracked, and people studying the (lack of) interest in the candidates take note.