• sub_ubi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When one of the two major parties becomes tired of losing elections, they adopt policies from a third party to attract their voters.

    The impact of third parties on American politics extends far beyond their capacity to attract votes. Minor parties, historically, have been a source of important policy innovations. Women’s suffrage, the graduated income tax, and the direct election of senators, to name a few, were all issues that third parties espoused first.

    • Rosenstone, Behr and Lazarus
    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So, it didn’t solve the problem? I’m not sure what you’re driving at here. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be multiple parties, I’m saying the vote during our presidential election, under our current system, is a strategic one, not one to throw away on a third party.

      • sub_ubi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s solved many problems.

        The point that the American historians quoted above are making is that if you enjoy certain policies, like being able to vote for senators, women’s rights, or progressive taxation, thank a third party voter.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Your quote talks about how third parties brought about some changes. At no point did I say third parties have no place in us politics, nor did I say never vote for third parties.

          • sub_ubi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            At no point did I say third parties have no place in us politics, nor did I say never vote for third parties.

            Not voting or voting third party for POTUS does nothing. It’s just pure vanity.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So, you don’t understand that the POTUS election is not the entirety of the us political system? I’m not sure what I’m supposed to say here, you quoted two very obviously different things.

              • sub_ubi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The examples I gave, 17th amendment, women’s suffrage, progressive taxation, were pushed by third party POTUS candidates.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  None of what you provided says anything about presidential elections.

                  • sub_ubi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Would you like me to link the exact candidates and elections?