• Thann
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I think that the title is misleading, because the plan was to make a huge housing development with a tiny part of land being donated to make affordable housing…

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      as far as i know, the alternative plan–and the one which seems to be going forward now–for development is one with no affordable housing as opposed to the 20 to 30 units which were expected, and these are the only two plans in serious consideration

      • Thann
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Honestly IDK, I’m mostly suggesting it may be misleading because we don’t know the full story, and it may be getting sensationalized.

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          By the time you had posted this comment chain it had hit almost every major news outlet and the reported story was the same. While you are right to question twitter, I checked for news stories on this as well as for explanations and decided it was trustworthy enough to post with the title I gave it knowing that there was a small chance it would need to be edited in the future.