• FreudianCafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thats wrong. Macron could not do any of this even if he wanted. Polarization is related to the instability of a regime. Capitalism is in deep crisis and the extreme positions start growing, while center positions become weaker until they cease to have any meaningfull existence. Its also naive to think that you can go back to when centrism was viable. Its not a matter of liking it or not, its how it works. Macron isnt dictating how history progress, its history that will do a driveby over Macron

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Macron was the centrist alternative last time around. He eroded his support by the way he conducted the country, foremost by how he unilaterally pushed retirement legislation through against the will of the parliament.

      So he had a hand in undermining the centrist position so in a way he did dictate historical progress.

      • FreudianCafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And he did it for personal reasons or because french capitalism needed it?

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s besides the point. I do personally think that reform was necessary, but his action opened up a can of worms if the RN ever gets to deliver a presidency.