Reasons why Mozilla VPN sucks - in a nutshell.

  • Price differences between Mull and Moz. Moz is more expensive and offers overall nothing new or even less.
  • Mullvad is longer in the business, trusted an an expert in the VPN field.
  • Less physical servers and depending on the region, overall slower.
  • Only front-end.
  • @Gamerie@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    The VPN is no reason to shit on mozilla. It doesn’t matter that mozilla has no public audit, they don’t rebrand mullvad for no reason. If people like to buy their vpn, ok, it is a good vpn, it’s mullvad just with a mozilla logo.

    • CHEF-KOCHOP
      link
      -6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There are other drawbacks mentioned which you swipe under the carpet.

      I also do not said they rebrand Mullvad I said that it is Firefox VPN just rebranded as Mullvad VPN under the hood.

      It is a useless VPN no one need, that is the bottom line here. Years too late to cash-gab people.

      • @Gamerie@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Do you mean “Less physical servers and slower speed”? That’s just depending on the needs the consumer has. E.g. I only need a handful of server locations and okish speed. Meaning, they could serve my demands.

        I didn’t mean to put words in your mouth. I was just lousy with my wording, sorry.

        I’d rather see mozilla getting a piece of the vpn cake than any of the shady vpn providers out there. Because under the hood it is still mullvad.