• OurToothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    you’d pick 50/50 odds of literally dying.

    Dude you have told people to touch grass and you think running into a black bear means you have a 50/50 chance of dying? Bwahahaha. Why yes, I’d rather startle a black bear than be alone in the woods with a guy.

    Touch -and I can not emphasize this enough: Grass.

    It’s just a misandrist talking point. Not rational. Purely emotional and made to create dissent and division. It’s inherently offensive to the 9/10 other, innocent men lumped in with the choice.

    As we all know women have a “this dude is a rapist” detector and “this dude is an abuser” detector, where we can easily distinguish between men who are threats and men who aren’t. Rape and DV only happen when we are waiting for the detectors to get back from regular maintenance or repair.

    • terminally_offline@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I didn’t say black bear. Try polar bear for odds? I just took the combined bear odds. You’re just an idiotic troll.

      Funny extra, notice how you only focus on the worst men, and the best bear. Almost like your argument would fall apart otherwise

      • OurToothbrush
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Lmao it is incredibly unlikely to run into a polar bear in the mainland US. Much less likely than running into a violent man.

        Funny extra, notice how you only focus on the worst men, and the best bear.

        Nah we are talking averages and uncertainty that exists in a low information scenario.