Solidarity denotes the unity and mutual support among individuals with shared objectives, crucial in protests for reinforcing collective resolve. Protests are strategically held in high-visibility, disruptive locations to maximize impact and draw public and institutional attention. This disruption compels acknowledgment of the issues, leveraging collective action to catalyze societal and political change. In contrast, low-visibility protests are often ineffective as they fail to generate sufficient public awareness or pressure for change.

  • Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 个月前

    We disagree on the “change the world” step significantly. I believe you have to do things to change the world, you believe thinking itself to change the world.

    You’re an idealist, a deeply unserious one at that.

    • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 个月前

      No, I believe that by thinking differently, you can change the actions that you take.

      By doing so, it changes the world.

      How else can you change a behavior?

      If you’re an alcoholic and want to stop, the first step is to think about stoping and create an environement without alcohol. Then you take the actions.

      If you want to do a protest, you first have to think about creating a protest in the world, then you take the necessary actions.

      I believe this very seriously.

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 个月前

        You’re completely missing the point. By your standard, the idea creates the change, asking the ruling class to be nicer creates change. This is nonsense.

        Change comes from actions. A change in material conditions. Protesters get nothing from just being loud, they must actually be disruptive to force change.

        • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 个月前

          Forcing change is tyranical and will be short-lived.

          Nobody likes being forced to do something. If you do, you will obviously meet resistance.

          For any positive long-lasting effect, you must persuade the ruling class to be nicer.

          Ideally, the idea should come from them. Not you.

          Instead of forcing change, simply allow them to change by themselves.

          • Cowbee [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 个月前

            Forcing the ruling class is the only way to get them to change anything.

            You cannot persuade the ruling class to be nicer. They will always act in their material interests, with no regard for morality.

            You are nearly a solipsist.

            • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 个月前

              Maybe I am.

              I think most people believe only hard power exists. Coercion. Force. Strength. Control. Etc.

              I’m not denying it.

              All I’m saying is that there is also power in patience, softness, morality, cooperation, etc.

              • Cowbee [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 个月前

                Virtues are nice, but they haven’t succeeded in getting change. Disruption and disturbance have.