So many ‘both sides are the same’ memes by Blue MAGA trying to voter shame like they do ever election year. We don’t live in a democracy, we haven’t in awhile. Another example of the plutocracy surfaced today…

  • Diva (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 个月前

    I think we both agree that it’s not enough- where we disagree is how credible an alterative Biden is, because you’ve dramatically oversimplified things in his favor in your metaphor. I’m not going to torture that metaphor any further as a response because I’m opposed to unnecessary cruelty on general principle.

    The reality is Biden has been the one continuing the Trump trade war shit on China. If this is really something you people are taking seriously why is he tariffing EVs and solar panels rather than doing whatever is necessary to meet our goals? I’m not exactly a free market girl, but American industry is not being served by these actions, and any subsidies handed to these industries immediately turn into stock buybacks. Something needs to fundamentally change and that’s off brand for you guys.

    re: student loan shit, I also think that wasn’t enough because the ‘academic industry’ needs to be razed to the ground and nationalized. And yes that includes all the stupid ‘ivy leagues’

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 个月前

      not enough

      wasn’t enough

      Do you think Trump is enough?

      I mean, I don’t think Biden is enough either, but using that as an argument for why Trump is better is some Mr. Mxyzptlk logic.

      Biden has been the one continuing the Trump trade war shit on China

      That’s a good point; he spent hundreds of billions of dollars (which he raised by increasing corporate tax) on boosting domestic manufacturing adding like 700,000 manufacturing jobs last I checked, instead of continuing to have everything constructed abroad and rich middlemen keeping all the profits.

      The WTO, if you remember those guys, was so angry about how he’s running his trade policy that they ordered him to change it back, and his State Department told them to piss up a rope we’re not changing a damn thing, representing one more big break he’s making with the neoliberal shit that is the recent history of the Democrats. It’s a good point, and I’m glad you brought it up.

      • Diva (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 个月前

        I’ll believe that domestic manufacturing when I see it, frankly. Democrats are big on promising things which haven’t happened yet. Ie how you’re taking credit for lowering emissions 2-6 years into some future presidents term

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 个月前

          Here ya go. It is, of course, a little more complex than I made it sound, but if I wanted to cherry-pick the sides of it that are good for Biden I’d say:

          On the job statistics, Biden is numerically correct. However, experts say he should use more caution…

          Officials pointed to data showing that it took 30 months — from April 2020 to September 2022 — for manufacturing jobs to return to their pre-pandemic recession peak. That may sound like a long time, but after the recessions that struck in 1990, 2001 and 2007, manufacturing jobs never even bounced back to their prior level after 100 months.

          Biden has created “a climate for factory investment that we haven’t seen for generations,” including the investments in infrastructure, clean energy manufacturing and semiconductors, Paul told PolitiFact. These are “already paying dividends. You can see from the ubiquitous factory announcements almost every week.”

          Gary Burtless, an economist at the Brookings Institution, a research and policy center in Washington, D.C., agreed that the gain in about 700,000 manufacturing jobs since the pandemic-era low has been unusually rapid.

          Not planning to respond to the other part, delving a little into why you’re claiming Trump is better exactly?

          • Diva (she/her)
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 个月前

            I’m not claiming Trump is better, they’re both genocidal, old, sex pests (being generous), and supported by their own legions of unquestioning followers.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 个月前

              It’s a good point - the very nature of Democratic politics, where a modest level of rebellion against Biden’s bad Israel policies can result in genuine change (although pretty tepid in comparison to what needs to happen). Things like pausing weapons shipments, sanctions on settlers, and setting up aid for Gaza does represent a significant structural difference between them and the Republicans, who are composed at this point pretty much of only “unquestioning followers” in your pretty accurate phrasing, would never have done anything like that, would have openly supported Netanyahu’s genocide instead of simply failing to prevent it, and are subject to only isolated hotspots of resistance even in the face of openly fascist or treasonous behavior.

              For example, no Republicans resigned from the executive branch because of family separation, or moving the embassy to Jerusalem, or the catastrophic mismanagement of the Iran nuclear deal and the resulting suffering of the Iranian people. It’s a good reminder that even when Biden is doing terrible things (like supporting Israel), he’s still open to some level of influence from the non-terrible people, while Trump is not.

              It’s a good point, and I’m glad you brought it up.

              • Diva (she/her)
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 个月前

                At this point after letting Israel run wild it’s hard to give them much credit for finally dialing it back. They could have simply not continued to send weapons, but they chose to do so. Now they show up with ‘aid’ like that somehow makes them not complicit in all the killing that’s already been happening.

                Recall what brash thing Trump did that really tanked the JCPOA? it was assassinating Suleimani with a drone strike. Here you’ve got American weapons being used to murder entire families, and are acting like you’re on higher ground than these other guys because the murder is being done by colonial proxies rather than obviously American hands.

                Can you see why people are a little bit annoyed by that and not consoled by your lectures about how because Biden is ‘less bad’ in debatable ways than Trump he is somehow worth empowering? When your only defense of the slaughter he allowed/insisted on is to expound on how in your imagination Trump is worse.

                You realize that not everybody else resides in the realm of your imagination?

                • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 个月前

                  You’re right – spending time debating with someone who’s unclear on what Trump did to the nuclear deal and the sanctions regime and the resulting impact on the Iranian people and the stability of the region in general, and assumes that assassinating Soleimani was what I was talking about just because that’s all they know about what happened in Iran under Trump because that was the most prominent story in the papers, betraying a lack of detailed understanding of US policy in the middle east and its impacts, might not be a good use of time, because at this point I think the point is pretty much made. It’s a good point, and I’m glad you brought it up.

                  Although, there’s still time to talk about adding 700,000 manufacturing jobs and strengthening unions in a way that hasn’t happened yet under any president post-Reagan, and why that might be a relevant good thing. Did we talk about that yet?

                  Or family separation? That’s actually kind of a hard one to talk about because I tend to get genuinely upset about it, but it’s a good window into the different levels of brown people friendliness the two presidents had, if we’re not wanting to examine Biden’s tepid resistance and compare it with Trump’s “finish the job” solution for Gaza?

                  Oh, also, you absolutely did say Trump was better than Biden in particular significant ways – here and here.

                  • Diva (she/her)
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 个月前

                    You’re talking like an LLM

                    in link 1 I said that at least Trump can be bullied, because the outcome of the CARES act and other pandemic relief was actually good.

                    in link 2 I said that Trump is better because at least with him in charge even complete drones like you can understand the state he’s a part of is worth opposing.

                    The fact that you opted to gloss over that from my previous statements, and boil it down to “Trump better than Biden”, does not indicate to me you are actually picking up on anything I’m saying beyond looking for an opportunity to regurgitate something about how you view your team as slightly better than the other team.