• alcoholicorn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Neither of us can convince someone whose friends had their asses beat by cops at a university protesting Biden’s action. Only Biden can do that, by ending the genocide.

    When dems lose for not doing the things they need to do to get elected, are you going to blame the dems for not winning what should be an easy election by just doing the things the people want him to do, using all the means at his disposal, or are you going to blame every single voter in the US for not voting for a party that shows nothing but contempt for them?

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        Considering his cabinet has stated they actively had to dissuade him, several times, from simply ordering military elements to “gun down” protestors during the Floyd protests in 2020…yeah.

    • FreddyDunningKruger
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      “what should be an easy election” <- this is how we know you are campaigning for Trump. There is no such thing as an easy election. Since 1992, Democrats have won the popular vote in 7 out of 8 elections, but that didn’t stop Bush from beating Gore, or Trump from beating Clinton.

      lol, all your type does is talk about dems dems dems, not a single word about Republicans or how much worse they have proven to be when they are in office.

      Trump said he would help Israel end the genocide, I guess that’s what you want after all, right?

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Oh, so you’re still under the delusion the DNC did nothing wrong, and it’s the voters who were wrong for not voting harder.

        Look at it this way: The democrats can change their own policy. They cannot change the psychology of the masses. No matter how much you yell at people for pointing it out, facilitating genocide, restarting student loans, letting Texas keep their child drowning fence, standing around while states ban abortion, are bad for electoral outcomes.

        The republicans are psychopaths whose policies are bad for the material conditions of 99% of Americans. This has been true forever, but here we are, with dems somehow right of Richard Nixon. You have to have absolute dogshit policies for it to even be close, and that’s exactly what got us here. “Well trump might have restarted student loan payments but worse” isn’t gonna convince someone who is building up credit card debt now because they can’t balance rent, food, and student loan repayments.

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          my student loan repayments are currently $0 due to the SAVE repayment plan. the threat i currently face as a borrower in repayment comes from states suing the Biden admin in federal court to stop affordable repayment.

          i see your propaganda. i hope others see it for what it is as well.

        • FreddyDunningKruger
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’m not under any delusions. ANY political party wielding power is going to make decisions that help some people and hurt others. It can’t be helped it’s the nature of power itself.

          I’ll repeat, the Democrats have won the popular vote 7 out of 8 times since 1992. They have the more popular policies on their side, and only have to fight rhetoric like yours. What are you doing to help change the Democratic party, hm? Tea Party and MAGA have each managed to get their fucknuts into power and change the direction of the Republicans towards fascism. What’s your plan, how does whinging in comment section trying to create voter apathy towards the Dems do anything but put Trump in office?

          In life, you have two mutually exclusive options: you can be right about something, or you can be effective. So you go ahead and keep on being the rightist guy in the room. The people who focus on being effective will manage to work around you.

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            The dems are on a trajectory to lose the election. Your tactic of pretending otherwise is both wrong and ineffective.

            I am not trying to create voter apathy, I am trying to create anger to encourage people pressuring the dems to do the things they need to do to win.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I notice a certain slight tendency in your comments to talk about China, implication that aid for Taiwan was “bought” from the US congress by someone, tendency to delve into the details of tariffs and suchlike.

      Quick question for you: If I protest in China against a Chinese policy I don’t agree with, what happens to me?

      (This isn’t a whataboutism – China doing something doesn’t excuse the US police from doing a much milder version of the same thing. I don’t think they should be beating or arresting protestors here either. I’m just curious how universally you apply this concern for protestors who had their asses beat.)

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Quick question for you: If I protest in China against a Chinese policy I don’t agree with, what happens to me?

        Quick Answer: You can just google “site:scmp.com (or any other english language chinese news site) protestors”

        You could probably find much better data if you googled the chinese word for protestors, but then you’d have to translate the results.

        Even when the government wants to shut down protests, such as in HK, it’s 100x more gentle than the US is. Think of how many people getting run over by cops we saw in 2020. I didn’t see a single child get domed with a pepperball in Hong Kong.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          100x more gentle than the US is

          Faaaaascinating

          Also, look at all the happy Uyghurs leaving their re-education camps after the Chinese government helped boost their job opportunities. Sounds great.

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, that is 100x more gentle than how the US deals with terrorism. Abu Garib was not giving people job training and setting them up with careers.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Bro, it’s not a fuckin contest

              I’m not in favor of Abu Ghraib, or Guantánamo, or the Uyghur detention camps, or the genocide in Gaza. From my point of view as a person who likes human rights, it’s actually not really that complicated to say that I’m not in favor of any of those things. It wouldn’t even occur to me to bring up one of them as a defense for any of the others, because I would have no reason to want to defend any of them.

              This is exactly why I wanted to ask you that seemingly unrelated question. I was curious whether you were an overall pro-human-rights person who came organically to your viewpoint about not wanting to vote for the Democrats, or whether that “of course I hate that Palestinian protestors in the US are being abused” – a pretty sensible view, tbh – came alongside some other views which were incongruous and surprising, and wouldn’t commonly be encountered in a person who has strong feelings about human rights and domestic US politics.

              Sounds like I got my answer.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                a person who has strong feelings about human rights and domestic US politics.

                My take on any enemies of the US is uncritical support; the only impact the US will have on those people is further immiseration, thus to criticize them as an American living in America is to carry water for imperialism.

                It’s why you see people get more worked up about Iranian oppression than Saudi oppression, despite Saudi Arabia being dependent on US military aid to oppress it’s people. The context of you, and American, hearing about gay rights in Palestine is to support further oppression of the Palestinian people.

                • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  My take on any enemies of the US is uncritical support

                  So if a third party won the presidency someday, and the US turned against Israel, you’d uncritically support Israel?

                  • alcoholicorn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    If the US stopped being the core of imperialism, of course I’d have to reevaluate.

                • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  My take on any enemies of the US is uncritical support

                  Also, I want to circle back to this for a second. Doesn’t this mean that we maybe shouldn’t take your advice on how as voters to approach the presidential election?

                  Or does your “enemies of the US get uncritical support” stance come in conjunction with a “the US election is very important to me and I have some criticisms of the Democrats but they’re purely meant from a constructive helping-the-country-get-better point of view” viewpoint on electoral politics?

                  • alcoholicorn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Yeah, there is a discrepancy, I should be voting for the candidate that would lead to the quickest and least violent destruction of the US, but I live here and I can’t give up the admittedly absurd hope that despite all evidence, the US will just you know, stop it, without a revolution or anything.

                    There is a difference in what libs and I consider “helping-the-country-get-better” is; I feel helping the country get better at imperialism is a bad thing, they don’t.

                    Conversely, I feel helping the country get better at improving material conditions for the working class at the expense of the capitalist class to be good, where libs do not.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  My take on any enemies of the US is uncritical support

                  Hey, thanks for being honest. I wish all of you guys would lead with that.

                  • alcoholicorn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Have you seen literally every single military action the US has taken since WWII?

                    If you assume the US is on the wrong side, you’ll end up with the right answer every time. They supported the fucking Khmer Rouge until 1993.

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes I will blame the voters who think their pride is more important than the safety of others.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dems lose? We all lose. You people seem to forget you’re fucking everyone. Your feelings don’t matter, outcomes do. If you know Trump wins in this scenario, and you know there may be no more free elections, how does this “force the Dems to learn for next time?” Braindead ideological bullshit. You’re a fucking cult.

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Why the hell are you coming at me then? I can’t control the dems policies, nor can I change the psychology of muslims to vote for a guy who is facilitating genocide. Nothing I say would convince someone who is struggling to pay rent because their student loans were resumed by executive order.

        The only thing either of us can do is pressure the dems to do the things they need to do to get elected. If Biden stops the genocide, then I could tell muslims “Hey, if you don’t vote Biden, Trump will resume it”, and college grads “Hey, if you don’t vote Biden, Trump will resume loan repayments”, and women “Hey, if you don’t vote Biden, Trump’s gonna remove your right to bodily autonomy” but I can’t do that because he doesn’t give me shit to work with.

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That’s nice, but it’s really hard to convince someone to vote for the person still pushing the knife deeper into them. Stopping further damage done via gaza and student loans are an absolute minimum. I’m not even expecting him to pull the knife out, let alone do something to heal the wound. The bar is underwater when I have to set it at “Not actively making your personal material conditions worse”. “Yes he’s making things worse for you and will not stop doing so, but some of the things he did aren’t objectively bad” is not gonna win an election.

            Also some of those were objectively bad, such as increasing militarism and oil production.

            • joenforcer@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s obvious you didn’t even read one sentence of the link. I know you and the troll farm have a job to do with your “Genocide Joe” rhetoric, but we’re tired of it and don’t want you here.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Except I referenced multiple things in that link; 3 of them were increased militarism, 1 was that oil production in the US had increased. Those are objectively bad things.

                • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I would argue domestic production of oil is a generally good thing, or at least neutral/balanced thing.

                  Yeah, we need to get away from oil, and we need more green generation, but that takes a long time. There’s a quick win in producing more domestically, by not having to import oil from halfway across the world, and also reducing foreign dependence for energy.

                  Problem is, last I heard, we are exporting most domestic oil now.

                  • alcoholicorn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    No, it’s not neutral, as oil prices increase, the incentive to invest in green energy decreases. There’s a reason US cars gas efficiency was abysmal until the oil embargo incentivized gas efficiency.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago
              • Biden attempted to forgive half a trillion dollars in student loans, and the Supreme Court told him no. He’s still managed to do about $150 billion on his own. In what sense are you saying he’s driving the knife in?
              • Biden is holding up military aid for Israel right now. Too little too fucking late, in my opinion, but you are aware that that’s happening, right? That the leader who is actively killing Palestinians is a whole different world leader on a whole different side of the planet?
              • There’s a whole conversation to be had about 40% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030; that may be opening up a significant additional topic. But you brought up oil production.

              That’s not even the main point. You said elsewhere:

              • You’d “have to” support Israel, even if they were genociding Palestinians just like they are today, if they weren’t on the same side as the US, because you support all enemies of the US uncritically.
              • “There is a discrepancy” between you wanting to drive the US as quickly as possible to its destruction, and being deeply concerned about Biden’s strategy and offering critique to what he’s doing (supposedly, ultimately, to help him win the election.)

              I don’t know man. I think you wanna think through that discrepancy at some length. I’m pretty doubtful that you’re sincere about what you’re saying. Sorry.

              If you actually are an American and this is actually what you believe, then you should know that I carry the same absurd hope that you’re talking about that the US can do better things. If you want better outcomes for the people inside the United States and less evil done in its name on the world stage, I think there are actually some good ways you can work towards that outcome.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Biden attempted to forgive half a trillion dollars in student loans,

                He restarted loan repayments. Every dollar paid on every loan he didn’t forgive is the knife going deeper.

                You’d “have to” support Israel, even if they were genociding Palestinians just like they are today

                No no no, I’d have to support the US against Israel. My fault, “I’d have to support it” was ambiguous, it could have been referring to the US’s opposition to Israel or Israel.

                • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  He restarted loan repayments

                  No he didn’t.. The relevant quote is, “But this time is different. The debt ceiling bill’s statutory language will tie Biden’s hands. Barring a new national emergency, he will no longer have the statutory authority to extend the current student loan pause.”

                  The thing that actually was in his power to do – forgive balances – he did. And, when other parts of the federal government cancelled his order to do a massive forgiveness, he did smaller forgiveness packages that added up to around $150 billion so far.

                  No no no, I’d have to support the US against Israel. My fault, “I’d have to support it” was ambiguous, it could have been referring to the US’s opposition to Israel or Israel.

                  Got it. Makes sense. So what made you change your mind? What’s different about Israel if they were an enemy of the US that would make you not support them (in a way that you would some other small middle-eastern country that was an enemy of the US)?

                  • alcoholicorn
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    So what made you change your mind?

                    I didn’t, the “oppose the US and you’ll be on the right side” heuristic only describes the end result, the core is still anti-imperialism. That is a weird scenario where the US is incidentally opposing its own imperialism.

                    Same with the US opposition to ISIS after they supplied them with weapons and trucks and personnel they trained and radicalized to fight Assad.

                    Same with the US opposition to Nazi Germany after they supplied them with materials and weapons to crush the communist at home and in hope they’d go after the USSR.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure but when Trump becomes president and you start to realise what you’ve done, don’t expect any help, sympathy, or even basic human decency.