• philluminati
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Further proof they aren’t really asylum seekers but illegal economic migrants.

    • c0m47053@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t really see how this represents any proof that these asylum seekers are illegal economic migrants. Rwanda isn’t a safe country for asylum seekers, so it seems reasonable that people would try and avoid being sent there. If Ireland now appears safer, then travelling there from the UK makes sense surely? The position for “illegal economic migrants” hasn’t changed substantially, as the likelihood of being sent to Rwanda is low. But if you are trying to reach safety, the threat of death or torture hanging over you might be enough to make you consider Ireland

      • philluminati
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If the EU is better than the UK, while travel from France in the first place?

        • c0m47053@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The UK has something in common with Ireland that maybe the rest of that EU doesn’t perhaps?

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        They aren’t refugees because they ain’t white. There does that answer your question? Every single time you hear someone get a deportation boner just remember this and it will explain their “reasoning”.

        If white = welcome

        If non-white = deport the rape-fugee.

        Nothing up the sleeves, no complex logic you can’t follow, no study you haven’t read, just racism as it appears to be.