• umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    not much use when states can already buy that information from data brokers, collected by period apps.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unless you’re being privacy-minded in the first place and don’t use those services.

      There’s most certainly a point to trying to keep people’s medical records secure, despite all the negative mindset around here.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        yeah sure, i personally don’t use “apps” in general, but we are the exception

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I belong to pretty big health care system in a pretty big US city with a big insurance provider and I’ve never even been encouraged to use one of these apps. Let alone use one.

          Might not be as common as you think.

          • umbrella
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            i dont think healthcare encourages the use of these, but regular people do use them to keep track

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Every layer of protection is good. Even if it’s not enough in itself the more layers you have the better. It’s what you can build future legislation off of. Sure Republicans are hell bit on taking our right of privacy away as much as they can, but if you give them little bits of it because of apathy they’re going to end up getting it all. Have to hang on to every shred we can while we can