Leading barrister warns that the kit – used to support gender-questioning children – is likely to be in breach of equality laws and could violate pupils’ rights

Archived version: https://archive.ph/jT7GK

  • Alex
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re reading a lot between the lines there. I would be concerned if I had a child with special needs whom I had discussed a plan with the school but they had just done something else anyway. Are you saying parents shouldn’t be involved with discussions about their childs care? We can’t know all the details here and jumping to conclusions about the parents motivation seems premature here.

    • porous_grey_matter
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      re you saying parents shouldn’t be involved with discussions about their childs care?

      I’m not op but absolutely yeah if the kid doesn’t involve their parents it’s for a good reason. They’re not reading very much between the lines, when kids are “estranged” from their parents it’s always the parents’ fault - and even if this particular case was the 0.0001% of times where it wasn’t, that wouldn’t impact what was the right thing for teachers etc to do.