@0x1C3B00DA @syzizeky If it was https://lemmy.ml/post/1146528 then I think we’re talking about the same thing from different directions. And really nearly anyone is more qualified to come up with valid suggestions towards the goal than I am… :)
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: November 5th, 2022
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
@0x1C3B00DA @syzizeky
Is this similar to what you’re talking about?
(Yeah, I’ll go look at your timeline in a moment to see if I can find the comment and the original thread.) 2/2
@0x1C3B00DA @syzizeky Without a pointer to the original comment, I believe this is exactly the feature I’m looking for, when I say that having {sub}@{every individual instance} will just dilute the conversation to well below useful/interesting levels.
The way I put it is I want a CNAME such that !foo@bar —> !foo@baz and you subscribe to the former if you’re on bar, and unless the CNAME is taken down because the !foo@baz folks go off the rails, they’re treated as identical. 1/2
@TDCN @GBU_28 i’m genuinely missing how the state keeping the car versus giving it back to the leasing agency is a reasonable choice. Why does the owner of the car, if it is not the violator, get to get fucked by this?