moved to username e-five on the same instance

  • 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 8th, 2023
  • e569668@fedia.ioto/kbin meta@kbin.social•Why doesn't blocking work?
    1·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, Mastodon has separate block and mute functions.

    Ah, good to know. I’ll have to look into it a bit more, but reading https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moderating/#block

    If you and the blocked user are on the same server, the blocked user will not be able to view your posts on your profile while logged in.

    It looks like the limitation that Pamasich and I sort of expected is there. Blocks are basically only possible at your own instance. If the user is on another instance, there’s no way to stop them in the fediverse. And that includes it going out to all other instances they federate with too.

    I sort of just experienced how this would work if implemented, in a way. A kbin social user posted to a beehaw org magazine. I replied to it, but my post does not seem to have made it to kbin social. However, it’s on my instance, beehaw’s, lemmy one, etc, because my instance federates with all of those instances. That’s sort of what blocking would be like if the original page refused an incoming comment due to a block, all other instances would still accept it. It’s possible there’s something I’m missing as I’m not super knowledgable on activity pub or the fediverse, so I’ll try to learn more about it

  • e569668@fedia.ioto/kbin meta@kbin.social•Why doesn't blocking work?
    1·
    1 year ago

    does the fediverse actually support the kind of block that’s being asked for here?

    Yea, that’s where I’m thinking the hangup on this might be. A block could be implemented, but it’d come with the caveat of that all it’s doing is giving you the idea they aren’t continuing to engage with you on your instance. On their instance, and any instance that federates with them, they and others will continue to see the replies.

    Personally, I would like to see block renamed to mute to be more accurate and a block from replying added with the note about the drawbacks of them being able to tell you blocked them and their posts still going out everywhere else. That at least empowers the user to make the decision themselves on what they’re most ok with. My reasoning is: changing the UI for, let’s say an aggressor, gives them a reason to retaliate. To me, either blocking method is a lose-lose; either it doesn’t stop engagement which some users clearly want it to, or it makes it obvious someone is being blocked which start aggressors down the retaliation path. That’s kind of why I’d want users to make their own risk assessment on actions.

    Anyways, that’s all very unlikely to happen. Most of all I’d like the bug about notifications fixed because that is clearly not working as intended.

  • e569668@fedia.iotoFediverse@lemmy.world•Can lemmy users message kbin users?
    2·
    1 year ago

    One thing I’m trying to keep an eye on is sup. Not much information at all besides a snippet of 1 to 1 encrypted messaging for activitypub, but the tidbit of working with any fediverse account is interesting. Potentially that could help deal with the different fediverse implementations of messaging. Of course, like I said, this is just me making up assumptions, it could not work the way I envision it at all. The creator just posted something 5d ago about it with “soon” though, so I’m hoping to read more about it

  • e569668@fedia.ioto/kbin meta@kbin.social•What's up with notifications?
    1·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to give false information, but on fedia the majority of 500 pages seemed to stem from the image media cache causing issues (our instance admin detailed the issue here). People were able to mitigate it by disabling images everywhere they could, but one place they can’t be disabled is the user avatars on the notification page. I could be wrong, but it’s my belief it’s those images causing the 500s, and that pushed me to add https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/1039 in hopes that if it was possible to disable them the 500s would stop. All this could be wrong though, maybe it’s something else like deleted messages or anything else, or maybe there’s a better way to solve issues with cached images

  • e569668@fedia.iotoBeehaw Support@beehaw.org•*Permanently deleted*
    1·
    1 year ago

    Appreciate the level-headed reply in this thread. There’s a lot of fingerpointing and hostility going on and I’d appreciate it if people would make less assumptions / jumps to attack people. I’m not sure if you or anyone else can confirm, but I agree with ernest that federation of mod actions was working once before. Without knowing exactly why it stopped, it’s hard to say what is going on.

    For instance, I just coordinated with the admins of startrek.website as their latest maintenance started blocking user agents with curl in it, which is what kbin sends, meaning all kbin instances stopped being able to get images from their instance. It seems like this is true for multiple other lemmy instances. I didn’t follow up with any other admins at the moment, but I think from that, and the fact that back when I originally signed up people would constantly complain kbin federation was broken when it was lemmy.ml that was blocking kbin, it’s not a good idea to jump to assumptions on why something isn’t working.

  • e569668@fedia.ioto/kbin meta@kbin.social•Admin of my instance seems to have gone inactive, looking to migrate to a small instance with an active admin
    2·
    1 year ago

    he’s eventually going to make sure abandoned instances have admins

    I think he meant magazines on kbin.social in this context. I don’t think he has any way to control another instance and change who runs it, besides a kindly worded letter.

    I do try to keep track of kbin instances and how up to date they are and their admins, but I can’t really advertise in their place. One thing I’ve kind of been thinking about is it’d be nice if nodeinfo had information next to current user count of like: desired user count, max user count. Otherwise you have no idea what an instance admin is hoping for, whether it’s just their personal instance or they’re willing to support tens of thousands of users. Without that I don’t want to send people to x instance and suddenly the admin being in for a surprise. But I just looked up nodeinfo and it looks like there’s plenty of worms in that can about it being too complex already, so maybe I’ll avoid opening my mouth about it… for now.