You say wsj is reputable, and then suggest filtering Murdoch. Murdoch bought wsj in 2007.

Isn’t the rule about hair not going past eyebrows or ear lobes? Every picture I’ve seen of this dude meets that requirement. I really don’t understand the reasoning behind the violation?

I haven’t played ED since the first person expack dropped. Really enjoyed it back then. Worth checking it out again? Has there been content releases? Heard the first person expack was pretty mixed.

I’m holding off until a new version. Doesn’t necessarily need to be faster, but I’m sure they’ve learned a ton with this release. Interested to see their 2.0 release.

And 90% of posts on lemmy seem to be about reddit…

Reporting in from US. The only results supporting this article are from the article itself. Garbage outlet. You should really just delete this post. It’s literally the driving force behind what you are complaining about.

“bringing up the nominations individually for roll call votes — a process that could take months and delay other priorities.”

“The monthslong holds have devolved…”

So just fucking do it. God knows the federal Senate isn’t doing fuck-all else.

Seconding this anecdote. Bought several pairs of smart wool and darn tough a few years back. Darn tough are still going strong, but my smart wool have significant holes.

I mean, based on consumer trends in the states, they’re not wrong.

I thought the same. I think it’s mostly the gloss that is making me not like it. Hopefully with the amount of variation Microsoft typically offers with controllers means the will be something that I can stomach.

I feel like this might genuinely be a “back in my day” moment. Greyed out options aren’t really a thing in modern tech design. The options…simply aren’t shown.

tbf, this is probably suburban / rural areas to move back into urban areas that are already having crises. Won’t fix any of the housing markets in high population centers.

That looks miserable

It’s simply a comment on how piracy =/= lost sales. Don’t look too far into it.

Not paying as much as someone currently makes doesn’t necessarily mean they are underpaying. Could be a different industry, department, etc.

It’s a fine balance. Too short term limits lead to straight up bribery without any repercussion (trying to hold on to a political position, for example).

https://youtu.be/tjdYmQBonew?si=emYoEDQ-7tb39-_o

Okay but being better able to detect X doesn’t mean you are unable to detect Y well enough. I’d say the physical attributes of children and dark-skinned people would make it more difficult for people to see objects as well, under many conditions. But that doesn’t require a news article.

They just cut their commercial division, right? Why on earth would you consider jumping into bed with a company that basically just made public that they won’t support you soon?