![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
1·
10 months agoI would Recommend Using Hyper V for linux VM if you are going with Windows
I would Recommend Using Hyper V for linux VM if you are going with Windows
immich is my Top 1
If it weren’t a Docker/Portainer replacement and were solely responsible for security, I would use it. Multiple applications are needed to have all the good security measures that you have implemented in one application.
"And it worked—it did the job, recorded stuff, and was fairly okay at motion detection. However, it consumed a significant amount of CPU and drew a lot of electricity for no real reason. You didn’t optimize it.
For me, with 4 4k Cameras + more 1080p cameras, it uses 1.5% to 3% when nobody is viewing the cameras. Of course, it will go up if somebody is viewing the cameras, as it will need to transcode to view it on the web. I wanted to try other alternatives as well on Linux, but I still preferred Blue Iris at the end.
You can find information on optimizing Blue Iris’s CPU usage in this link: Optimizing Blue Iris’s CPU Usage.
https://ipcamtalk.com/wiki/optimizing-blue-iris-s-cpu-usage/