Note:

I swapped the original article at the request of a mod to from a source deemed more reliable, but to avoid confusion when reading the comment section prior to this edit, here is the link to the original article. I chose the Relief Web source listed by some who commented. Cheers!

  • ???@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 个月前

    While I see what you mean by that, is the title being “biased” equal to the article being biased? Seems like all doubts are resolved upon reading the first paragraph.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 个月前

      Most people don’t read the articles, they read titles and they take the inference and go to the comments and fight. Titles that are misleading are effectively lies.

      In the propaganda war, titles are ammunition

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 个月前

        Okay, good point, like I said, I know what you mean about the title, but does a bad title necessarily mean the article is not factual?

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 个月前

          Yes. Misleading title is a lie. Putting that lie into the title of our community makes this entire discussion premised on a lie. Most people are not going to read the article, and the hasbara / propaganda of the title still gets the eyeballs. So it is a net negative