• PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not trying to be hyperbolic but states selectively choosing who is allowed to be voted on as opposed to having it run as intended can cause a justification for a second civil war. This shouldnt be allowed. I dont care how vile Trump is to you. There is no rule that it can be left to the states to withhold votes in a federal election.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      This isn’t states choosing. It’s the US constitution rightly preventing those who tried to destroy the country from ever holding office.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Was Trump convicted of insurrection or rebellion? Please remind me when he went to jail for insurrection. Ill agree with you 100% if he was proven guilty in a trial for insurrection. If not, then the state is taking it upon themselves to make shit up.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The precedent is that he doesn’t need to be convicted of insurrection for the insurrection clause to apply.

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Were any of the Confederate leaders convicted? No, because the earliest incarnation of the law you’re referring to weren’t created until 50 years later. That was not the intent of the authors of the 14th amendment, as it would have hurt the reconciliation process to imprison all former Confederate leaders. They were nevertheless prevented from holding federal office.

        • Prophet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Funny that you don’t even try to deny that Trump may have been involved in inciting/leading an insurrection. It’s only that he hasn’t been found guilty of it by the courts. How will the goalposts shift if he is found guilty?

          • PatFusty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Dont get me wrong, i am only trying to defend the process. I would never vote for trump, he is an incarnation of everything we should not like about a portion of our society. Trump should have been thrown in prison years before he was even president for his many instances of fraud.

            With that said if trump is found guilty of insurrection, which he absolutely should be, then i would say toss him in jail and let him rot. He is a disgusting human being and society is better without him.

    • Soulg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Section 3 of the 14th amendment. It’s in the constitution. This Isn’t just random fuckery, he incited a violent mob to try to overthrow the government, therefore he is ineligible for office. Because no shit, but ALSO because it’s written into the rules of the country.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Read section 3 for me please. Tell me where it says the states can take it upon themselves to decide to absolve. It does say insurrectionists would be inelligible for office but its not up to the state to decide that.

        But either way, shouldnt he be charged with insurrection before you make decisions like these? Literally proving his point that they will try any way to get him off the ballot, legal or not. I wonder why other states like Minnesota and Michigan refused to take him off the ballot…

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Back in the day, pro-life people set up fake abortion clinics used to trick women - delaying their “appointments”, forcing them to look at ultrasounds and not having people that could, you know, perform abortions. Democrats rightly passed a bunch of laws that forced any abortion clinic to, you know, perform abortions.

      Then the republicans retaliated. They started passing ridiculous requirements - like going to the clinics and measuring door sizes then passing laws saying that doors need to be larger than what they had; then up-ing the ante by requiring “abortion reversing drugs” (that didn’t exist) should women want to stop mid abortion.

      Should Trump be disqualified enough to loose, look to Republicans to start passing ridiculous disqualification criteria. Supported BLM once? Well, BLM rioted once, so that was an insurrection and thus you are now disqualified from ever holding office. In fact, look for this happening anyways. Cause if a republican is in power somewhere, under their logic it is unconstitutional to challenge them.