• grte@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A commensurate increase in pay so that you are making the same money but working fewer hours. I don’t think anyone seriously puts forward this idea and proposes achieving it via having everyone earn 20% less.

      • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Afaraf
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it’s just an increase in pay, a lot of us are just going to work even more. Because now we get to survive. Let me know when you’re talking about real economic changes that help everyone thrive.

        • grte@lemmy.caOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well in that case you’d still benefit from the change because overtime would kick in after 32 hours instead of 40. But this is just one change and shouldn’t be thought of as the entirety of the labour movement. Of course reducing inequality and putting more of the nation’s wealth in the hands of working people is a part of the project.

          • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Afaraf
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well in that case you’d still benefit from the change because overtime would kick in after 32 hours instead of 40.

            “Overtime” doesn’t “kick in” when you’re working at your third job that only gives you 20 hours a week because they “can’t afford” to pay overtime every time you have to cover someone else’s shift.

            Of course reducing inequality and putting more of the nation’s wealth in the hands of working people is a part of the project.

            As we continue to move away from full-time jobs to a gig based economy, none of this applies to anyone that needs it. If you want to put money into the hands of working people, just put money in their hands. Capitalism is incapable of providing care for the members of society that don’t have capital, and trying to fix society’s problems with Capitalist tools is doomed to fail.

            • grte@lemmy.caOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I agree. In my view, the project of the labour movement is socialism. Part of getting people on board with that vision is it’s proponents winning tangible benefits for people like that outlined in the article. You can’t just get to socialism by critiquing the current system, you have to build a sustained, organized movement and the labour movement, being a movement of the working class, aligns nicely along the idea of putting the working class in charge.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you think you’re actually paid anywhere close to the value of your work?

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        absolutely not, I bill my own work so I know exactly how much its worth. I bill my own bi-weekly pay stub in 3-5 hours.