“Google has taken great pains to appear more open than Apple, licensing the Android operating system to third parties like Samsung and allowing users to install apps via other methods than the Play store. Apple does neither. When it comes to exclusivity, Apple has become synonymous with “walled garden” in the public imagination. So why did a jury find that Google held a monopoly but Apple didn’t?”

  • Solivine@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your explanation is right, but the last sentence makes you insufferable

    • SkyNTP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed. Also the fact that the cases where different on technical merit ignores the fact that the moral hazard for both cases is still the same, so we are still left with the question, how did we still end up with injustice? The implication here is plain to see: clearly the justice system failed.