• noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    Adding choice to the customer

    “you can have your memory eaten by our website in your browser, or by our website in a separate browser window wearing fake moustache and glasses” doesn’t seem to be much of a choice.

    meanwhile if you launch their services using something other than a glorified Chrome tab, like spotify-qt or ripcord, they both end up consuming like one tenth of the resources the official clients do.

    • boff@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why do you think everyone cares to optimize every single ounce of their ram memory. There is a lot more to UX than that.

      I would rather an imperfect choice than none at all