• key@lemmy.keychat.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      The demotivational format is one I’m thankful to be rid of. They were good for like 5 days when they would actually parody the original posters. But then it was years of it being an absurdly awkward caption format

  • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used Linux since 1996 and don’t recommend it to anyone. They might want help with something.

  • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you ever get these after a contacting customer care, here is how they work:

    10/10: ok. No need to reprimand employee

    9/10: acceptable every now and then

    Anything less than 9/10: talk to employee about their low performance and lacking commitment

    This applies to all questions asked, including “how is the weather?” and “did you sleep well tonight?”

    So here is how I answer, knowing how it works:

    Employee helped me or at least tried to (and was hindered by company bullshit): 10/10, no exception. Yes, I will sacrifice my firstborn on your corporate altar and will build a shrine to your CEO in my bedroom. Of course I will recommend [product] and to anyone and everyone I will ever meet and praise [company] with my dying breath.

    Mediocre service: no reply

    Truly awful service, employee was a dick: 2-4/10, so it does not look like petty revenge, but is still bad

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have more understanding of this situation than the brainless executives demanding that the survey be included.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate that

      On the occasion I don’t give a 5 or 10 or whatever is the max I explain in the comments that n is perfection and very difficult to achieve but n-1 is still very good, but I also never give less than max to the employee, I apply your same logic (disregard the survey)

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      In our defense, Arch is the best OS out there by far, if you aren’t too dumb to install it.
      (I use Arch, by the way.)

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can install Arch blindfolded without archinstall, but I don’t think it is the superior option.

        It is either unstable or maintenance-heavy, depending on how you treat it, compared to other distributions.

        It is bleeding-edge though, and pretty memory-effective and speedy.

      • nicoweio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        With NixOS on the rise, I’m not sure how much longer this remains the case. Haven’t tried it yet, though.

      • Liforra@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Arch is a great os, great wiki, great packages. But it expects the user to do everything themselves. Which is something that not everyone wants to do, which is fair

        I use arch btw (im new to it lol)

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh… both are questionable. Morally superior, maybe, but definitely not right.

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Both aren’t really sustainable. Open source doesn’t pay live-able wages without some kind of proprietary component and going full vegan is very detrimental to the health and sometimes even the cause itself. I’m not a dictionary and english isn’t my first language, but in my understanding, the “right” thing should at least be viable, without taking compromises from the other side.

            To clarify, I’m not saying that open-source and veganism are bad or we shouldn’t aim towards those. What I’m saying is that, while half-opensource like redhat and half-veganism (on supplements) is viable, so is all-meat diet and all-proprietary software, but not going full RMS opensource-only and getting rid of all animal-based products without causing even more damage to the ecosystem with the alternatives. Maybe we’re missing some puzzle pieces (like properly implemented communism) or the end-goal is a bit off, or, maybe, going half-way is actually the “right” thing all along.

    • Mint@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So majority keep it to themselves, and those who aren’t vegans bother them about being vegan?

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      so… constantly and unprovoked forced to defend their choice of OS and refute bullshit myths by Windows users?

  • Acters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Friend always talks about talking about linux with girls, acts weird and stuff. Its so dramatic, I wonder if he is being sarcastic. On the other hand, he is the only person I know outside of the internet who talks about linux while using a windows laptop as a daily driver

    • dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn, I used to be that guy too (the one who talks about Linux whilst using Windows). I actually posted my Windows rice as a Linux rice in unixporn a while ago…it really did look like Linux.

      I use NixOS now, but I keep Windows on a separate drive in case I ever need it.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use Linux btw.

    Gimp is great and free btw.

    I can just compress that video with a single command btw.

    You want to resize that image? Let me pull up a terminal. This is Linux btw.

    ( Even though not all of us are using Arch, we all have little Arch trolls inside us)

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    BS, everyone always talks about the latest version of windows as if 98 isn’t the template all modern guis start with.

    Me personally, tho, only run ME.

  • Nerii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t true either, because when I’ve built computers in the past, we go over which OS is trash.

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And since when recommending operating system is weird? People recommend YouTube channels, productivity apps, TV shows, tech gadgets… Recommending something that is second most popular thing is not weird.

    I got a friend who was constantly downloading shit from shady “gratis” software sites injecting adware. Because of common reinstalling I had to do for him I had to create second partition for his personal files to not constantly transfer them back and forth the USB disk. But then he struggle to manage his files, because I couldn’t just put his /home directory on separate logical volume, no. Windows required him to juggle files around C: and D: drives with fixed sizes and with Desktop and Downloads being on C: anyway. People using Btrfs or LVM know what I am talking about. As he mostly used a browser, LibreOffice and games from Steam/Epic, why I shouldn’t suggest him another OS?

    Another example can be my grandpa with older computer (talking 2GB of RAM) that is perfectly happy with lightweight but modern system. Or my nephew who loves playing with painting programs, webcam and Minesweeper-like games without additional popups or TikTok shortcuts being placed in app menu.