This iconic mouse is weeks away from being in the public domain
www.deseret.com
Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when ‘Steamboat Willie’ enters the public domain

This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when ‘Steamboat Willie’ enters the public domain

  • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
    125·
    1 year ago

    Steamboat Mickey could be in Smash Bros if Nintendo wanted to license it, but IIRC Smash Bros is specifically only properties owned by Nintendo on purpose. Smash Bros is effectively free advertising for other Nintendo games, in addition to a fighter.

    I don’t see why Disney, rather than Walt himself, shouldnt own the copyright on Mickey Mouse.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      Because the whole point of copyrights is to promote creativity. No one at Disney today had anything to do with creating Mickey Mouse. Why should they have the exclusive right to create derivative works? The people who are there seem perfectly capable of coming up with new characters. And the copyright expiring will push them to do so.

      And besides, it’s not really about Mickey Mouse. It’s also about art, music, and literature. Beethoven’s heirs shouldn’t be getting a check every time an orchestra plays the 5th Symphony.

      • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
        323·
        1 year ago

        Why should they have the exclusive right to create derivative works?

        Because Mickey Mouse is a core brand to the company. It’s literally referred to as the “House of Mouse”

        • azimirEnglish
          13·
          1 year ago

          Then Disney Inc will need to get creative and figure out a new way to brand itself. That’s whe reason why copyright is limited, not eternal.

          • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
            17·
            1 year ago

            That’s whe reason why copyright is limited, not eternal.

            It very literally is not.

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.worldEnglish
      121·
      1 year ago

      You do realize there’s a metric ton of non-Nintendo characters in Smash, right? It’s essentially a celebration of gaming as a whole. Mickey isn’t a video game character though, that’s why they used Sora. Same reason Goku and Superman aren’t in Smash.

        • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6·
          1 year ago

          He’s been in games, but he’s definitely not a ‘video game character’ in the way that Mario, Sonic, and Cloud Strife are.

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            53·
            1 year ago

            Sorry it was just a joke. I didn’t think I needed a /j, but I should know better. Poe’s law.

            Edit: just gonna leave this here as proof of Mickey’s hardcore game roots…

            1000012285

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.eeEnglish
      41·
      1 year ago

      Smash Bros is supposed to be a celebration of the gaming industry, not just Nintendo. Minecraft Steve/Alex and Banjo/Kazooie are Microsoft properties. Joker is owned by SEGA, and Persona 5 wasn’t even on Switch until years after Joker was announced for Smash. Sephiroth and Cloud are Square Enix properties. Sora is a Disney property. There are way too many non-Nintendo characters in Smash for it to be “free advertising” for Nintendo.